politics:philosophy:shadowpolitics
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
politics:philosophy:shadowpolitics [2025/04/27 16:30] – [“Antiwoke”, Transgenderism, and Pedophilia] Owen Mellema | politics:philosophy:shadowpolitics [2025/05/06 02:08] (current) – [The Future: The Satanists] Owen Mellema | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
We can now also understand why political groups suffer when everyone agrees with them. They suffer from their members having an excess of Sameness. The political group will therefore lose it's relevancy and it's group feeling, and members will go to other political groups to get their group feeling fix. | We can now also understand why political groups suffer when everyone agrees with them. They suffer from their members having an excess of Sameness. The political group will therefore lose it's relevancy and it's group feeling, and members will go to other political groups to get their group feeling fix. | ||
- | ===== " | + | ===== The Shadow in Past, Present, |
+ | |||
+ | ==== The Past: " | ||
Like many of my thoughts, the concept of shadow politics came to me as I was trying to understand modern US politics. In particular, I was trying to understand how fascism, which I consider to be one of the worst possible political ideologies, had managed to gain a foothold among the population. More broadly, I was interested in how a liberal society had produced so many people that were opposed to liberalism. | Like many of my thoughts, the concept of shadow politics came to me as I was trying to understand modern US politics. In particular, I was trying to understand how fascism, which I consider to be one of the worst possible political ideologies, had managed to gain a foothold among the population. More broadly, I was interested in how a liberal society had produced so many people that were opposed to liberalism. | ||
Line 155: | Line 157: | ||
In 2016, I predicted that a billionaire, | In 2016, I predicted that a billionaire, | ||
- | ===== “Antiwoke”, Transgenderism, | + | ==== The Present: |
- | ==== The Shape of the Right ==== | + | **The Shape of the Right** |
Now we must consider the other side of the political equation, that is, the Right. It seems to me that there are about six segments of the modern Right, give or take: | Now we must consider the other side of the political equation, that is, the Right. It seems to me that there are about six segments of the modern Right, give or take: | ||
Line 187: | Line 189: | ||
I don’t (necessarily) say this to levy a criticism of the “antiwoke right”, but rather to explain its obsession with degeneracy, and why “the degenerate” is the shadow of the group. | I don’t (necessarily) say this to levy a criticism of the “antiwoke right”, but rather to explain its obsession with degeneracy, and why “the degenerate” is the shadow of the group. | ||
- | ==== Transgenderism | + | **Transgenderism** |
- | During Trump’s 2024 campaign, he ran an ad with the tagline “Kamala is for they/them; Trump is for you”. We see from this that the existence of transgenderism ends up being a useful political tool for Trump. It is an enemy that he can gesture to and say - “be afraid! Those horrible people over there will win if you don’t give me power!” | + | During Trump’s 2024 campaign, he ran an ad with the tagline “Kamala is for they/them; Trump is for you”. We see from this that the existence of transgenderism ends up being a useful political tool for Trump. It’s clear why this is — it is a sexual and aesthetic form that can sometimes elicit a feeling of shock and disgust in cisgender individuals. |
- | If you are paying attention, you should notice that this indicates that transgenderism is the shadow of the Right. It’s clear why this is — it is a sexual and aesthetic form that is out of the ordinary. It is true that transgender people can sometimes elicit a feeling of shock and disgust in cisgender individuals. I’m not saying this to be rude, nor am I saying that this is a good thing, I am simply describing the reality. | + | In order to justify revulsion towards this group of people on logical grounds, there is a narrative that transgenderism is a social contagion, in which older transgenders “groom” impressionable, |
- | + | ||
- | In order to justify revulsion towards this group of people on logical grounds | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Although I disagree with this narrative in the aggregate, let’s assume for a moment that it really is true, that transgenderism is a social contagion that is growing because they are grooming children. Suppose that I was the “arch-tranny”, | + | |
* **Isolation**: | * **Isolation**: | ||
* **Closed Ranks**: I would make it so that many people were very angry at transgender people, sometimes lashing out physically, to cause transgender people to operate in secret and close ranks. | * **Closed Ranks**: I would make it so that many people were very angry at transgender people, sometimes lashing out physically, to cause transgender people to operate in secret and close ranks. | ||
Line 205: | Line 203: | ||
* **Apathy towards the youth**: I would make the group of people that were most opposed to transgenderism also the group of people that seemed to be apathetic towards things most effecting young people, such as school funding. | * **Apathy towards the youth**: I would make the group of people that were most opposed to transgenderism also the group of people that seemed to be apathetic towards things most effecting young people, such as school funding. | ||
- | I hope it’s clear that I think that the Republicans seem to be doing more for the transgender movement than even the Democrats. | + | I hope it’s clear that I think that the Republicans seem to be doing more for the transgender movement than even the Democrats. |
+ | |||
+ | **Pedophilia and other Sex Crimes** | ||
+ | |||
+ | [TODO: Karoline Levitt' | ||
+ | |||
+ | On April 26th, 2025, the Trump administration put a row of posters on the White House lawn, [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | This concern seems to be entirely disconnected from reality. It is clear to me that there has never been a safer society for children than ours. The University of New Hampshire [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | // | ||
+ | |||
+ | If there has been a // | ||
+ | |||
+ | Like what happened with fascism, there is greater demand for pedophiles than there are actual pedophiles. To meet the demand, pedophilia will be projected onto an ever-increasing subset of the population, especially upon those that the government finds convenient | ||
+ | |||
+ | Having this perfect tool to slander their enemies, the Right will be able to get away with almost anything, under the auspices of protecting children. This tool, however, will be their undoing. For every non-pedophile accused of being a pedophile, the power of the word to control people decreases. People will become desensitized and ambivalent to claims of pedophilia. " | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== The Future: The Satanists ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | At this point, it should be clear what will happen next. The Right, unable to restrain their own shadow, will project it onto the world, bringing forth their ultimate enemy. The Right fears degeneracy, so this group of people will embrace degeneracy. The Right fears darkness, so this group will embrace darkness. They will reject all rules, especially moral and spiritual rules; they will be a form of devil-worshipper, | ||
+ | |||
+ | " | ||
+ | |||
+ | I have also paid close attention to the rise of psychopathic internet groups, who delight in causing suffering to individuals for no real reason. Entire communities of people are built around the shared harassment of people. Those that oppose it are labeled " |
politics/philosophy/shadowpolitics.1745771413.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/04/27 16:30 by Owen Mellema